Re: setproctitle() no longer used?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: setproctitle() no longer used?
Дата
Msg-id 200005111528.LAA13719@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на setproctitle() no longer used?  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> On Wed, 10 May 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > Oh.  Can you look at the setproctitle code on your platform and see
> > how it implements it?
> 
> In the end I believe we'll make the world a better place if we're using
> setproctitle when available. Sendmail does. If someone really complains
> about speed loss we can always make it an option not to use it, but I
> won't buy into that until I see some profiling evidence.

Good point.  I just did it because it worked on BSD, and I don't have
setproctitle.  If sendmail does it by default if setproctitle exists,
maybe that is the way to go.

BSDI 4.01 doesn't have setproctitle, but I don't need it because I can
just assign anything in there.

I saw the FreeBSD code, and it seems they have added a sysctl() call in
the library setproctitle code to handle it.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: setproctitle() no longer used?
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: setproctitle() no longer used?