Re: Reindex vs Vacuum analyze

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vincent Janelle
Тема Re: Reindex vs Vacuum analyze
Дата
Msg-id 20021101180357.069fa8e0.random@goblinstudios.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Reindex vs Vacuum analyze  ("Gaetano Mendola" <mendola@bigfoot.com>)
Ответы Re: Reindex vs Vacuum analyze
Список pgsql-admin
when entries are deleted from an table they're not deleted from the
index, and vacuum doesn't clean them up.  reindex recreates the index.
It is suggested that you run a script at whatever necessary intervals to
recreate the indexes on your tables if they have large amounts of data
deleted from them on a regular basis.

Mine creates a temporary index, drops the old index, and renames the
temp index to the old one's name.  After all that, then it performs a
vacuum.

On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 12:27:48 +0100
"Gaetano Mendola" <mendola@bigfoot.com> wrote:

> I repeat my simple experience for
> know about what is going on:
>
> push=# explain analyze select * from jobs where status = 'r';
> NOTICE:  QUERY PLAN:
>
> Index Scan using idx_jobs_status_r on jobs  (cost=0.00..8.57 rows=3770
> width=49)
>  (actual time=19.26..1295.73 rows=5 loops=1)
> Total runtime: 1295.85 msec
>
> EXPLAIN
> push=# vacuum analyze jobs;
> VACUUM
> push=# explain analyze select * from jobs where status = 'r';
> NOTICE:  QUERY PLAN:
>
> Index Scan using idx_jobs_status_r on jobs  (cost=0.00..3.12 rows=1
> width=49)
>  (actual time=0.08..1318.36 rows=5 loops=1)
> Total runtime: 1318.48 msec
>
> EXPLAIN
> push=# reindex table jobs;
> REINDEX
> push=# explain analyze select * from jobs where status = 'r';
> NOTICE:  QUERY PLAN:
>
> Index Scan using idx_jobs_status_r on jobs  (cost=0.00..3.12 rows=1
> width=49) (actual time=0.04..0.15 rows=4 loops=1)
> Total runtime: 0.24 msec

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL Installation on SCO
Следующее
От: Vincent Janelle
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: DB Performance