Re: Impact of loss of unique SERIAL?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephan Szabo
Тема Re: Impact of loss of unique SERIAL?
Дата
Msg-id 20030430072030.M81999-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Impact of loss of unique SERIAL?  ("Justin Long" <justinlong@strategicnetwork.org>)
Список pgsql-admin
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, Justin Long wrote:

> I am new to these lists and this message may be off-topic for this list. If
> so, please advise and I will repost to one of the others. Here is the
> question:
>
> We have been running Postgres 7.2.x for our website, and are considering the
> upgrade to 7.3.x. However, in reading through the changelogs I notice that
> SERIAL values are no longer unique. Now, I'm no SQL guru, but I'm wondering
> what happens if two INSERTs are done at the "same" time (we have multiple
> web hosts that access one large database server). Would they result in two
> identical values on the SERIAL? We haven't gotten a stupendous amount of
> traffic, so I don't know what the odds of this are, but I'm wondering why it
> was removed.

The values from the sequence still should be unique (even for two inserts
at the "same" time) -- it's still a sequence, but it doesn't also add a
unique constraint to the table in addition.  You can add a unique
constraint to the table with alter table if it's important (like the fact
that you expect there to be an index on that or you want to reference that
column and didn't specify it as unique/primary key).


В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Sullivan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Impact of loss of unique SERIAL?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Impact of loss of unique SERIAL?