Re: constraint with reference to the same table

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Victor Yegorov
Тема Re: constraint with reference to the same table
Дата
Msg-id 20030515001239.GC1549@nordlb.lv
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: constraint with reference to the same table  (Rudi Starcevic <rudi@oasis.net.au>)
Ответы Re: constraint with reference to the same table  (Rudi Starcevic <rudi@oasis.net.au>)
Re: constraint with reference to the same table  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
* Rudi Starcevic <rudi@oasis.net.au> [15.05.2003 02:59]:
> Hi,
>
> Can I confirm what this means then ..
>
> For large table's each column with ref. inegritry I should create an
> index on those columns ?

I think, that indicies are needed only at delete stage to decrease search
time of possible referencing rows.
Not only, of course, but when we speak about
INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE data it is so.

On the other side, indicies increases total query runtime, because for
each row deleted/updated/inserted it'll be necessary to update each index.

In my case, I at first drop "cyclic" constraints, do the job and then
restore them.


--

Victor Yegorov

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rudi Starcevic
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: constraint with reference to the same table
Следующее
От: Stephan Szabo
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: constraint with reference to the same table