Re: Request for translation of pgAdmin3 into Traditional Chinese

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jean-Michel POURE
Тема Re: Request for translation of pgAdmin3 into Traditional Chinese
Дата
Msg-id 200306250923.23456.jm.poure@freesurf.fr
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Request for translation of pgAdmin3 into Traditional Chinese  (Jean-Michel POURE <jm.poure@freesurf.fr>)
Список pgadmin-hackers
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 05:38, you wrote:
> I've read the documentations you mentioned in your last e-mails and got
> poEdit and pgAdmin3.pot. However, I am not familiar with the rules for the
> strinngs in pgAdmin3.pot. I am not sure what should I do with the back
> slashes or the double quote mark... etc, could you send me some example
> files other translators made to me? I think the simplified Chinese version
> by Weiping He would be most useful for me. Then I will make a try again.

Dear Chih-Hsin,

Thank you very much for trying to translate pgAdmin3 into traditional Chinese.
I am adding you to the list of translators to make sure that two persons do
not work on the same translation at the same time.

Also, maybe you should register pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list.

This can be done sending an email to pgadmin-hackers-request@postgresql.org
with the word "subscribe" in the body of the message. I CC my answer to the
list if you don't mind.

pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org allows translators to share knowledge and
answers. Typicaly, your question is interesting because poedit is able to
hide double quotes. In menu Display, unset Show Quotes (sorry, I use the
French localised version, the menu may be a little bit different in English).

If you have any problems with quotes, do not hesitate to get back to us on the
list and CC me (because the list is sometimes slow to deliver messages).

We thank you again for your kind help.
Cheers,
Jean-Michel


В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Adam H.Pendleton
Дата:
Сообщение: pgConn.cpp.patch
Следующее
От: "Dave Page"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgConn.cpp.patch