On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Jan Wieck wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
> >
> >> Seems like we should also allow for a windows specific distribution of libpq
> >> as well.
> >
> > I thought that the win32 stuff was being included as part of the base
> > distribution? IF so, wouldn't such already be included in any
> > libpq.tar.gz we created? Is there a reason why we'd need a
> > libpq-win.tar.gz (assuming that that is what you are suggesting?) ... ?
>
> I think he meant a separate binary, somehow installer-wrapped libpq.dll
> - right?
>
> Honestly I think that doesn't do much for windows. It would only do if
> we would add many other, more or less dependant interfaces, like ODBC,
> Pgtcl, Pgperl?, JDBC, MyDBC ... but then we get into all the license,
> packaging, distribution hassle.
Well, actually, I believe Dave already does up the ODBC driver in binary
form ...
And dont' we have a 'native, non-cygwin' libpq already?