Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial

On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> scott.marlowe writes:
>
> > Do we need official permission to call the language plPHP by the way?
>
> Can someone explain to me why language handler modules for PostgreSQL are
> always called "PL/Language"?  Consider if someone wrote a language binding
> for Scheme, then calling that "procedural language Scheme" sounds like an
> insult to me.

vs calling them ... what? :)

For lack of any other suggestion, they are always called PL/Language?