Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> > I'm just guessing the behavior was changed to keep form emails from
> > being delayed via non-subscribed emails trying to post to the list?
>
> Dunno, delay was never a problem with the old implementation. I think
> Marc may have some special case in place in the mail list software
> to allow bug-form reports to pass through. Marc?
>
> I'd prefer the From: line to get fixed anyway. Even though setting a
> reply-to line would suffice for getting a reply's To: field correct,
> it would not help the problem that quote insertion produces
> pgsql-bugs writes:
> > ...
> rather than
> <submittername> writes:
> > ...
> which is really the polite way to phrase it.
I like the currently fixed setup. I like the fact that they come in
with no delay, and reply/group reply work fine.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073