wespvp@syntegra.com wrote:
> On 3/25/04 4:13 PM, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
>
> > Are you sure your change is correct? We just added
> > "-D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS" in post 7.4.2, and the submitters did not
> > mention any problems with the -pthread line for gcc.
> >
> > I just tried it on Sourceforge's Solaris 9 and I see:
> >
> > bash-2.05$ gcc -pthread
> > gcc: unrecognized option `-pthread'
> > gcc: no input files
> >
> > which seems to indicate you are right. I am kind of surprised. Some
> > platforms to take -pthread, some -lpthread, so I am pretty sure it was
> > specified by the original Solaris guy.
>
> Don't know... I assume it was just a typo that wouldn't show up if you were
> using SUNWSPRO compiler instead of GCC.
>
> > OK, new template/solaris version applied to 7.4.X and head:
>
> [snip]
>
> > THREAD_SUPPORT=yes
> > NEED_REENTRANT_FUNCS=yes # 5.6 2003-09-13
> > THREAD_CPPFLAGS="-D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS"
> > if test "$GCC" != yes
> > then THREAD_CPPFLAGS="$THREAD_CPPFLAGS -mt"
> > fi
> > THREAD_LIBS="-lpthread"
>
> Shouldn't that be
>
> THREAD_CPPFLAGS="-D_REENTRANT -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS"
>
> According to Jan, -D_REENTRANT must also be specified for libpq to be built
> correctly.
OK, I added -D_REENTRANT.
> Why isn't -D_THREAD_SAFE required also?
No idea? Someone?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073