Re: logfile subprocess and Fancy File Functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: logfile subprocess and Fancy File Functions
Дата
Msg-id 200407201817.i6KIHfX07806@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: logfile subprocess and Fancy File Functions  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: logfile subprocess and Fancy File Functions  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Andreas Pflug wrote:
> > Apparently it's best to invent a log_file_prefix = 'pgsql_' guc
> > variable.
>
> In any case, the prefix "postgresql-" is more in line with current
> practice.

For logs I think pgsql_ is best because that filename is already going
to be long, and I don't usually like dashes in file names.  They look
too much like arguments, but tarballs use them and it looks OK there, I
guess.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: logfile subprocess and Fancy File Functions
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump --clean w/ <= 7.2 server