Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)
Дата
Msg-id 200412032137.42690.peter_e@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)  (Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Where the buildfarm falls down a bit is on the cross-product
> coverage. But I think you're not going to get the cross product
> without a call for port reports; there aren't that many people who
> are going to offer dedicated time on every random platform there is.

Once RC1 is out and the build farm has picked it up, we should start 
filling out our little table with the build farm results and then look 
for ways to fill the holes.  Does the build farm turn on all the 
compiler options?  It really should.  I'm looking for

/configure --prefix=SOMEWHERE --enable-thread-safety --with-tcl \ 
--with-perl --with-python --with-krb5 --with-pam -with-openssl
make
make install
make check

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)
Следующее
От: Kenneth Marshall
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)