On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:39:18PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> It doesn't seem totally out of wack. You will be limited by the memory
> bandwidth and it looks like you get something on the order of a few
> hundred references to memory per row. That may be a little high, but
> it doesn't seem ridiculously high.
I just tested 8.0.0rc1 -- I got a _50%_ speedup on this operation...
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/