Re: serial increments on failed insert

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Fetter
Тема Re: serial increments on failed insert
Дата
Msg-id 20050115171417.GB32500@fetter.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на serial increments on failed insert  (David Kammer <djkammer@u.washington.edu>)
Список pgsql-general
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 04:48:12PM -0800, David Kammer wrote:
> Ive noticed what seems to be an odd effect in psql 7.3.  It works like this:
>
> 1> Create a table:
> CREATE TABLE foo
> (
>   sval serial,
>   uval int UNIQUE
> );
>
> 2> Run 3 inserts, the second of which fails because it fails the
>    unique constraint:
> INSERT INTO foo VALUES (DEFAULT,1);
> INSERT INTO foo VALUES (DEFAULT,1);   <--- This fails
> INSERT INTO foo VALUES (DEFAULT,2);
>
> 3> look at the table:
> SELECT * FROM foo;
> sval | uval
> ------+------
>    1 |    1
>    3 |    2   <--- look here
> (2 rows)
>
> Notice that even though the second insert failed, it still
> incremented the serial value.  This seems counter intuative to the
> way that serial should work.  Is this truly a bug, or is there a
> good work around?

Perhaps the docs need revision to clarify this.  The SERIAL type is
meant to generate id's (in this case, integers) which are guaranteed
to be unique.  Because they have this uniqueness property, they are
*not* guaranteed to be gapless.

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100   mobile: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Martijn van Oosterhout
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: OID Usage
Следующее
От: Thomas F.O'Connell
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PL/PgSQL Boolean Comparison Operator Binding