Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL
Дата
Msg-id 200501241545.51737.josh@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL  (Ragnar Hafstað <gnari@simnet.is>)
Ответы Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL  (Ragnar Hafstað <gnari@simnet.is>)
Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL  ("Peter Darley" <pdarley@kinesis-cem.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Ragnar,

> note that these sometimes do not provide connection pooling as such,
> just persistent connections (Apache::DBI)

Yes, right.

> no. you can only count on web-server-process==connection, but not
> web-user==connection, unless you can garantee that the same user
> client always connects to same web-server process.

Are there ones that you use which might use several different connections to
send a series of queries from a single web-user, less than 5 seconds apart?

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ragnar Hafstað
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL
Следующее
От: Litao Wu
Дата:
Сообщение: reltuples after vacuum and analyze