On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 09:50:41PM -0500, Jan wrote:
> I've been using PostgreSQL for about three months. So far my
> only objection is that "pg_affected" provides the number of attempts
> rather than the number of rows that are actually changed. I could
> easily do that with a little counter.
Please provide some context: What "pg_affected" are you talking
about? How are you determining that it provides "attempts" instead
of "actual"?
> I think PostgreSQL should be changed to return the number of rows
> actually changed (whether updated, inserted or deleted).
Please provide an example of what you're doing, what results you
expect or would like to see, and what results you actually get.
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/