Re: GUC variable for setting number of local buffers

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005, Tom Lane wrote:

> That means we can go ahead with providing a GUC variable to make the 
> array size user-selectable.  I was thinking of calling it either 
> "local_buffers" (in contrast to "shared_buffers") or "temp_buffers" (to 
> emphasize the fact that they're used for temporary tables). Anyone have 
> a preference, or a better alternative?

temp_buffers sounds more descriptive ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664