Re: Fixing r-tree semantics

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Fuhr
Тема Re: Fixing r-tree semantics
Дата
Msg-id 20050623225347.GA39028@winnie.fuhr.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Fixing r-tree semantics  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Fixing r-tree semantics  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Fixing r-tree semantics  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 05:59:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Fixing the existing operators seems relatively straightforward; there will
> need to be some extension to rtstrat.c to represent "NOT this operator"
> as well as "this operator", but that's not hard.  I plan to do this, and
> make the corresponding fixes in contrib/rtree_gist as well.

Excellent.  If the fix is straightforward, is it going to be
backpatched at least to 8.0?  Or is backpatching not worthwhile,
considering that hardly anybody stumbles across the problem or
complains about it?

-- 
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew - Supernews
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fixing r-tree semantics
Следующее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GiST rtree logic is not right