CURSOR slowes down a WHERE clause 100 times?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Niccolo Rigacci
Тема CURSOR slowes down a WHERE clause 100 times?
Дата
Msg-id 20050706211946.GA3460@rigacci.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: CURSOR slowes down a WHERE clause 100 times?  (John A Meinel <john@arbash-meinel.com>)
Re: CURSOR slowes down a WHERE clause 100 times?  (Niccolo Rigacci <niccolo@rigacci.org>)
Список pgsql-performance
Hi to all,

I have a performace problem with the following query:

  BEGIN;
  DECLARE mycursor BINARY CURSOR FOR
    SELECT
      toponimo,
      wpt
      FROM wpt_comuni_view
        WHERE (
          wpt &&
          setSRID('BOX3D(4.83 36, 20.16 47.5)'::BOX3D, 4326)
        );
  FETCH ALL IN mycursor;
  END;

I get the results in about 108 seconds (8060 rows).

If I issue the SELECT alone (without the CURSOR) I get the
same results in less than 1 second.

The wpt_comuni_view is a VIEW of a 3 tables JOIN, and the "wpt"
field is a PostGIS geometry column. The "&&" is the PostGIS
"overlaps" operator.

If I CURSOR SELECT from a temp table instead of the JOIN VIEW the
query time 1 second.

If I omit the WHERE clause the CURSOR fetches results in 1
second.

Can the CURSOR on JOIN affects so heavly the WHERE clause? I
suspect that - with the CURSOR - a sequential scan is performed
on the entire data set for each fetched record...

Any idea?

This is the definition of the VIEW:

  CREATE VIEW wpt_comuni_view AS
    SELECT istat_wpt.oid, istat_wpt.id, istat_wpt.toponimo,
      istat_comuni.residenti, istat_wpt.wpt
      FROM istat_comuni
      JOIN istat_comuni2wpt
        USING (idprovincia, idcomune)
      JOIN istat_wpt
        ON (idwpt = id);

Thank you for any hint.

--
Niccolo Rigacci
Firenze - Italy

War against Iraq? Not in my name!

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Fuhr
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ALTER TABLE tabla ALTER COLUMN columna SET STATISTICS number
Следующее
От: John A Meinel
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CURSOR slowes down a WHERE clause 100 times?