Gevik,
> I'm not discouraged in anyway... I have just been looking over and over
> for a CMS that we could use in our project. Time after time I end up
> with commercial products. And even if they are opensource, they need to
> be so much customized that one has to put more time in customizing the
> CMS framework rather than building the actual requirement.
What is it you're trying to implement, exactly, that you don't find
supported? Is it the tree structure?
Even if existing CMSes require customization, I think it'd be better to
work with that project and try to get them involved in the feature. As
far as I know, the only CMS you've really tried is Drupal.
Both Bricolage and Framewerk are intimate with the PostgreSQL community and
could be counted on to work with you. I don't think you even looked at
Bricolage after Marc set it up.
I also don't think you've evaluated "more time to implement" using valid
criteria. If you do a custom CMS, you're going to need to impement all of
the common stuff yourself:
Authentication
User management (including "e-mail me my password, etc.")
Approval/rights structures
Versioning admin
Editors (inc. wyswyg and/or bbcode edit)
RSS
etc.
Did your really add up coding all of the above compared to customizing an
existing system?
Again, I'm not trying to discourage you, but from my perspective half a CMS
is worse than none.
--Josh
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco