* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Richard van den Berg <richard.vandenberg@trust-factory.com> writes:
> > Is there a good reason that the official RPM on postgresql.org is not
> > build with HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP ? It would have been so nice if this
> > would have worked. :-/
>
> You've got that 100% backwards: you should be complaining to Debian that
> it's not their business to editorialize on the default setting.
The default setting sucks. You're advocating a position which would
mean more work for our users (since they'd have to recompile their own
packages to achieve a sane setting). No thanks.
Stephen