Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl> writes:
>> Yeah. We agreed in principle awhile back to "fix" this on the backend
>> side by postponing the actual transaction start until the first command
>> after BEGIN.
> Actually, my patch is waiting for you to review it ;-) On the other
> hand, since I'm already touching that code, maybe I can include it in my
> patch. Or would you prefer to keep those things separate?
I'd opt for keeping it separate I think ...
regards, tom lane