Re: Schema vs Independant Databases, ACLS,Overhead,pg_hba.conf

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Schema vs Independant Databases, ACLS,Overhead,pg_hba.conf
Дата
Msg-id 20060225160300.GD4756@surnet.cl
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Schema vs Independant Databases, ACLS,Overhead,pg_hba.conf  ("Eric Lauzon" <eric.lauzon@abovesecurity.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Eric Lauzon wrote:

Hi,

> Now that the issue is that we can't implement a per connection user/ACL
> pair  , would it be a good idea to implement
> Schema ACLS and mabey pg_hba.conf Schema acls

This is certainly possible to do using GRANT and REVOKE on the schemas;
no need to fool with pg_hba.conf.  You can of course create groups/roles
to simplify the assignment of privileges, as needed.

Apart from the much more efficient queries (i.e. using cross-schema
queries instead of dblink), I don't think you're going to see much
change in performance, because most things like WAL and shared buffers
are shared among all databases anyway.  You'd save a bit by not having
multiple copies of system caches (pg_class cache, etc), but I wouldn't
know if that's going to be very noticeable next to the primary
improvement.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Luke Lonergan"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reliability recommendations
Следующее
От: Javier Somoza
Дата:
Сообщение: fsync and battery-backed caches