On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 10:18:11 +0900, Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net> wrote:
>
> Time (and timestamp) is a bit of a issue conceptually. The "default"
> successor function would depend on the precision of the timestamp.
And in the ideal case it doesn't exist. That is why I think a closed, open
interval is a better way to go.