Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 08:21:41AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> From Bruce's perspective this actually doesn't add too much to the
> >> workload. Generate the link, possibly paste some archive urls into the
> >> wiki and then someone can come behind and clean up.
> >
> > Or better yet, if editing the TODO is more accessible then we're not
> > dependent on one person to maintain it.
>
> To be fair, Bruce has offered to allow that to happen even on his home
> machine (Bruce that is a bad idea btw) and ANYONE can submit a patch. It
Probably, but that's OK.
> may not be a web interface that people could log into but it is entirely
> possible to contribute back with it.
It is very easy to update because it is a simple text file. The HTML is
added automatically. Hard to see how it could be easier than that. I
can even pull a TODO file from some server location and update from that
if you don't want to ssh in but want to put your version at some URL.
Or update update the CVS version and email it to me.
-- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +