Tom Lane wrote:
> momjian@postgresql.org (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> > pgsql/src/pl/plperl/sql:
> > plperl.sql (r1.7 -> r1.8)
> > (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/pl/plperl/sql/plperl.sql.diff?r1=1.7&r2=1.8)
>
> Shouldn't there be an 'expected' update to go with the test-file update?
> The few buildfarm members that aren't dying because of the GUC patch are
> failing on this one. I'd commit a fixed expected file if I could get
> HEAD to work locally, but ...
OK, I have backed out both plperl patches and returned the email to the
patch queue.
(Strange both the guc and plperl patches didn't generate any warnings
here. I don't think I can test plperl here but I know the guc was
tested.)
-- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +