Re: [GENERAL] Index greater than 8k

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От tomas@tuxteam.de
Тема Re: [GENERAL] Index greater than 8k
Дата
Msg-id 20061102100015.GA15966@www.trapp.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] Index greater than 8k  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 07:16:37PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > a "functional trigram index"? (this would be very cool).
>
> Heh :-)  I meant an index, using the pg_trgm opclass (which indexes
> trigrams; hence the "trigram" part), on a function that would extract
> the text from a bytea column [...]

[goes back to cave, tests...]

Wow, that works:

  CREATE INDEX i2 ON words USING gist(lower(word) gist_trgm_ops);

so I can interpose a (of course immutable) function before gist/trigram
does its thing. Why didn't I dare to assume that this will work?

Thanks for the hint.

- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFScGvBcgs9XrR2kYRAl9tAJ9JvWvVo0nrexs409IIKPustuJkXwCbBW5n
W5/wwTogiSdg3rhTXq5pRio=
=t90X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Magnus Hagander"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Design Considerations for New Authentication Methods
Следующее
От: "Simon Riggs"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [SQL] Case Preservation disregarding case