Re: CLUSTER = slower vacuum?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: CLUSTER = slower vacuum?
Дата
Msg-id 20070926163241.GH8572@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на CLUSTER = slower vacuum?  ("Phoenix Kiula" <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Phoenix Kiula escribió:
> After I clustered the primary key index of a table with about 300,000
> rows, my vacuum/analyze on that table is taking too long ... over 15
> mins when originally it was 15 seconds! Nothing else has been changed
> with this table. Is clustering not good for vacuums?

No.  Something else must be happening.  Maybe examine the output of
vacuum verbose to see where the time is going?

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Poor performance with ON DELETE CASCADE
Следующее
От: Martijn van Oosterhout
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Duplicate public schema and user tables