On 2023-07-19 13:58, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 03:48:43PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I have begun cleaning up my board, and applied 0001 for the moment.
>
> And a few weeks later.. I have come around this thread and applied
> 0002 and 0003.
>
> The flow of 0002 was straight-forward. My main issue was in 0003,
> actually, where the TAP tests were kind of confusing as written:
> - There was no cleanup of the files still present after a single
> command check, which could easily mess up the tests.
> - The --dry-run case was using the list of WAL files for the extension
> pattern checks, hardcoding names based on the position of its array.
> I have switched that to use a third list of files, instead.
>
> The result looked OK and that can be extended easily for more
> patterns or more commands, so applied 0003 after doing these
> adjustments, coupled with a pgperltidy run, a pgperlcritic check and
> an indentation.
> --
> Michael
Thanks for the reviewing and applying the patches!
--
Regards,
--
Atsushi Torikoshi
NTT DATA CORPORATION