Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> >>> Furthermore HP is hardly the authoritative reference on SSL. Can't
> >>> we find an RFC or something?
> >>
> >> See above.
>
> > If anything, we should link to OpenSSL, because they implement the API we are
> > referring to. I don't know what HP has to do with it.
>
> Yeah, I was thinking a simple pointer to www.openssl.org would be more
I looked at the SSL docs and they are _minimal_:
http://www.openssl.org/docs/
In fact "[STILL INCOMPLETE]" is on almost every item.
> appropriate. We're not here to substitute for somebody doing their
> own Google search ...
The HP page is not a primary Google hit --- it took me trolling though
many copies of the SSL manual pages to find it.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +