Re: {**Spam**} Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dimitri Fontaine
Тема Re: {**Spam**} Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
Дата
Msg-id 200802072029.51468.dfontaine@hi-media.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: {**Spam**} Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Le Thursday 07 February 2008 17:19:26 Tom Lane, vous avez écrit :
> > Not having looked into exactly how it works and if it's something we
> > want, but if we want to, any reason we can't just point it at the svn
> > mirror?
>
> Synchronization problems scare me.

AIUI we're talking about one way synchronization (from CVS to SVN) only, and
that's considering review-board is not able to do CVS directly (which seems
wrong).
The quick doc reading I've made showed a read-only tool at the SCM side ---
the accepted patch won't get commited for you by the tool.

> The point I tried to make earlier was that if we actually started to
> rely on such a tool, we'd want to fix it to talk to CVS.

Others are pointing it does in fact talk to CVS even if the documentation
about this is... to be written.

Regards,
--
dim

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Dawid Kuroczko"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: configurability of OOM killer
Следующее
От: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: {**Spam**} Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan