Re: Severe regression in autoconf 2.61

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Severe regression in autoconf 2.61
Дата
Msg-id 200802191046.55238.peter_e@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Severe regression in autoconf 2.61  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Severe regression in autoconf 2.61  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Severe regression in autoconf 2.61  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Am Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Previously, AC_FUNC_FSEEKO did this to test if fseeko was available:
>         return !fseeko;
> Now it does this:
>         return fseeko (stdin, 0, 0) && (fseeko) (stdin, 0, 0);
>
> Unfortunately, that gives the compiler enough of a syntactic clue
> to guess that fseeko is probably an undeclared function, and therefore
> *it will not error out*, only generate a warning, if it's not seen
> a declaration for fseeko.

Please try the attached patch.

What is currently the consequence of the problem?  Does it fail to build, fail 
to run, or does it fail with large files?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gregory Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ANALYZE to be ignored by VACUUM
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Getting available options