2GB or not 2GB

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема 2GB or not 2GB
Дата
Msg-id 200805281659.26945.josh@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: 2GB or not 2GB  (Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>)
Re: 2GB or not 2GB  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: 2GB or not 2GB  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
Re: 2GB or not 2GB  ("Jignesh K. Shah" <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>)
Re: 2GB or not 2GB  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: 2GB or not 2GB  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Folks,

Subsequent to my presentation of the new annotated.conf at pgCon last week,
there's been some argument about the utility of certain memory settings
above 2GB.  I'd like to hash those out on this list so that we can make
some concrete recomendations to users.

shared_buffers:  according to witnesses, Greg Smith presented at East that
based on PostgreSQL's buffer algorithms, buffers above 2GB would not
really receive significant use.  However, Jignesh Shah has tested that on
workloads with large numbers of connections, allocating up to 10GB
improves performance.

sort_mem: My tests with 8.2 and DBT3 seemed to show that, due to
limitations of our tape sort algorithm, allocating over 2GB for a single
sort had no benefit.  However, Magnus and others have claimed otherwise.
Has this improved in 8.3?

So, can we have some test evidence here?  And workload descriptions?

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Creating large database of MD5 hash values
Следующее
От: Steve Crawford
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 2GB or not 2GB