On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 10:31:25AM +0200, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Scott Marlowe, 31.08.2008 22:44:
>> I think some of it is inertia. We've always used Oracle, let's
>> just keep on using it. The more conservative the IT department is,
>> the less likely they are to take chances with new technology.
>>
>> It used to be there was about an 80/20 split between what things
>> you could do with either postgresql or oracle, and the other 20%
>> was oracle only land. I think that number is dropping quickly, and
>> we're into the 1 or 2% club of what Oracle can do that PostgreSQL
>> isn't fast enough for.
>
> For me (personally) the ratio is more like 70/30,
It's about to increase :)
> because we are making extensive usage of Oracle's windowing
> functions
http://umitanuki.net/pgsql/wfv04/design.html
> (and ability to easily deal with hierarchical data using CONNECT BY).
It's even more fun with CTEs.
<http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CTEReadme>
> The lack of windowing functions is a bit frustrating as I'm
> otherwise a big Postgres fan!
Those will both be fixed, at least to a large degree, in 8.4 :)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate