Re: Weird behavior with "sensitive" cursors.

Tom Lane escribió:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Tom Lane escribió:
> >> Well, the first problem is that 8.4 is failing to duplicate the
> >> historical behavior.
>
> > Oh!  That's easy.
>
> I don't think that testing rowMarks is the right thing at all here.
> That tells you whether it's a SELECT FOR UPDATE, but actually we
> want any cursor (and only cursors) to have a private snapshot.

The attached patch implements this.  I intend to apply to 8.4 and HEAD
shortly.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.