Khee Chin <kheechin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Recently, I encountered a situation where the docs on (or impl?)
> INCLUDING INDEXES and INCLUDING CONSTRAINTS are not clearly defined
> for primary keys. Should it be noted in the docs that in this case, we
> are referring to the technical implementation of a primary key, i.e. a
> unique index and a not null constraint, thus both conditions are
> required?
It might be a confusable feature, but it should be discussed separated
from this patch. IMO, almost all user will use "INCLUDING ALL"
if the syntax is added by the patch.
Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center