Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> My (limited) experience is that it's usually better to get something
> incremental committed, even if it's not what you really want. You can
> always take another crack at the remaining issues later, but if the
> whole patch gets shot down then you are out of luck.
Yeah, that makes sense. But the partial change should also be
a "long-term solution" ;-). It is hard to determine whether
the partial change is a good solution until the whole features
works as expected (at least partially).
Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center