Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Дата
Msg-id 20100208132311.GA4113@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)  (Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Список pgsql-hackers
Takahiro Itagaki escribió:
> 
> KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:
> 
> > >     default:    both contents and metadata
> > >     --data-only:    same
> > >     --schema-only:    neither
> > 
> > However, it means only large object performs an exceptional object class
> > that dumps its owner, acl and comment even if --data-only is given.
> > Is it really what you suggested, isn't it?
> 
> I wonder we still need to have both "BLOB ITEM" and "BLOB DATA"
> even if we will take the all-or-nothing behavior. Can we handle
> BLOB's owner, acl, comment and data with one entry kind?

I don't think this is necessarily a good idea.  We might decide to treat
both things separately in the future and it having them represented
separately in the dump would prove useful.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Pathological regexp match
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hot standby documentation