Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration
Дата
Msg-id 201002261847.o1QIl9Z29565@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > How to handle situations where the standby goes away for a while,
> > such as a network outage, so that it doesn't block the master from ever
> > cleaning up dead tuples is a concern.
> 
> Yeah, that's another issue that needs to be dealt with. You'd probably
> need some kind of a configurable escape valve in the master, to let it
> ignore a standby's snapshot once it gets too old.
> 
> > But I do know that the current Hot Standby implementation is going to be
> > frustrating to configure correctly for people.
> 
> Perhaps others who are not as deep into the code as I am will have a
> better view on this, but I seriously don't think that's such a big
> issue. I think the max_standby_delay setting is quite intuitive and easy
> to explain. Sure, it would better if there was no tradeoff between
> killing queries and stalling recovery, but I don't think it'll be that
> hard to understand the tradeoff.

Let's look at the five documented cases of query conflict (from our manual):
1     Access Exclusive Locks from primary node, including both explicit      LOCK commands and various DDL actions 2
Dropping tablespaces on the primary while standby queries are      using those tablespaces for temporary work files
(work_mem     overflow) 3     Dropping databases on the primary while users are connected to      that database on the
standby. 4     The standby waiting longer than max_standby_delay to acquire a      buffer cleanup lock.  5     Early
cleanupof data still visible to the current query's      snapshot
 

We might have a solution to #1 by only cancelling queries that try to
take locks.

#2 and #3 seem like rare occurances.

#4 can be controlled by max_standby_delay, where a large value only
delays playback during crash recovery --- again, a rare occurance.

#5 could be handled by using vacuum_defer_cleanup_age on the master.

Why is vacuum_defer_cleanup_age not listed in postgresql.conf?

In summary, I think passing snapshots to the master is not something
possible for 9.0, and ideally we will never need to add that feature.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.comPG East:  http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard
drive,Christ can be your backup. +
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gokulakannan Somasundaram
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration