Re: strange query plan with LIMIT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От anthony.shipman@symstream.com
Тема Re: strange query plan with LIMIT
Дата
Msg-id 201106081834.07263.anthony.shipman@symstream.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: strange query plan with LIMIT  (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: strange query plan with LIMIT  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: strange query plan with LIMIT  (tv@fuzzy.cz)
Список pgsql-performance
On Wednesday 08 June 2011 17:39, Claudio Freire wrote:
> Of course optimally executing a plan with limit is a lot different
> than one without.

I imagined that limit just cuts out a slice of the query results.
If it can find 80000 rows in 0.5 seconds then I would have thought that
returning just the first 100 of them should be just as easy.

>
> Just... why are you sorting by diag_id?
>
> I believe you would be better off sorting by timestamp than diag_id,
> but I don't know what the query is supposed to do.

The timestamp is only almost monotonic. I need to scan the table in slices and
I use limit and offset to select the slice.

I've forced the query order with some pgsql like:

declare
    query   character varying;
    rec     record;
begin
    -- PG 8.3 doesn't have the 'using' syntax nor 'return query execute'

    execute 'create temporary table tt on commit drop as ' ||
        'select diag_id from tdiag ' || v_where;

    query = 'select * from tdiag where diag_id in (select * from tt) ' ||
            'order by diag_id ' || v_limit || ' ' || v_offset;

    for rec in execute query loop
        return next rec;
    end loop;
end;

--
Anthony Shipman                 | Life is the interval
Anthony.Shipman@symstream.com   | between pay days.

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: tv@fuzzy.cz
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: strange query plan with LIMIT
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: strange query plan with LIMIT