Re: autovacuum and default_transaction_isolation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dan Ports
Тема Re: autovacuum and default_transaction_isolation
Дата
Msg-id 20111130003400.GE24208@csail.mit.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: autovacuum and default_transaction_isolation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:04:23PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm.  Shouldn't we make the autovac launcher use READ COMMITTED, too?

Yeah, probably. That one doesn't seem so important because its
transactions aren't long-running (IIRC, it only starts a transaction to
scan pg_database). But it wouldn't hurt to keep it from pointlessly
registering a serializable transaction.

Dan

-- 
Dan R. K. Ports              MIT CSAIL                http://drkp.net/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: autovacuum and default_transaction_isolation
Следующее
От: Daniel Farina
Дата:
Сообщение: backup_label during crash recovery: do we know how to solve it?