Re: New statistics for WAL buffer dirty writes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: New statistics for WAL buffer dirty writes
Дата
Msg-id 20121023161253.GI4971@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: New statistics for WAL buffer dirty writes  (Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga@uptime.jp>)
Ответы Re: New statistics for WAL buffer dirty writes
Список pgsql-hackers
Satoshi Nagayasu escribió:

> With this patch, walwriter process and each backend process
> would sum up dirty writes, and send it to the stat collector.
> So, the value could be saved in the stat file, and could be
> kept on restarting.
>
> The statistics could be retreive with using
> pg_stat_get_xlog_dirty_writes() function, and could be reset
> with calling pg_stat_reset_shared('walwriter').
>
> Now, I have one concern.
>
> The reset time could be captured in globalStats.stat_reset_timestamp,
> but this value is the same with the bgwriter one.
>
> So, once pg_stat_reset_shared('walwriter') is called,
> stats_reset column in pg_stat_bgwriter does represent
> the reset time for walwriter, not for bgwriter.
>
> How should we handle this?  Should we split this value?
> And should we have new system view for walwriter?

I think the answer to the two last questions is yes.  It doesn't seem to
make sense, to me, to have a single reset timings for what are
effectively two separate things.

Please submit an updated patch to next CF.  I'm marking this one
returned with feedback.  Thanks.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: too much pgbench init output
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: too much pgbench init output