On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 01:46:32AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > I guess that suggests we should be calling this something like
> > 'ssl_authorized_client_roots'.
>
> I'm no longer convinced that this really makes sense and I'm a bit
> worried about the simple authentication issue which I thought was at the
> heart of this concern. Is there anything there that you see as being an
> issue with what we're doing currently..?
I too am worried that make SSL even more flexible will make simple setups
more complex to setup.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +