On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:07:21PM -0500, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> This is a performance patch, so it should come with benchmark results
> demonstrating that it accomplishes its intended purpose. I don't see
> any.
>
>
> Yes, this is a performance patch, but as the subject says, it saves a few
> instructions. I don't know how to write a test case that can measure savings of
> skipping a few instructions in a startup sequence that potentially takes
> thousands, or even millions, of instructions.
Are we saying we don't want this patch?
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +