Re: [GENERAL] About upgrading a (tuple?) lock in a rollback'd sub-transaction

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: [GENERAL] About upgrading a (tuple?) lock in a rollback'd sub-transaction
Дата
Msg-id 20140411025247.GC5822@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] About upgrading a (tuple?) lock in a rollback'd sub-transaction  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] About upgrading a (tuple?) lock in a rollback'd sub-transaction  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-docs
Amit Langote wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> wrote:
> > And it also tells you how to stop it --bibtex iirc
>
> Yeah, it's a caution against a potentially harmful usage anyway. Users
> should not use it at all.
>
> I was just wondering if the description of the behavior, that is,
> potential disappearance of certain locks is complete enough.

You do realize that this is no longer the case in 9.3, right?
I don't see a point in changing old releases' documentation.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] About upgrading a (tuple?) lock in a rollback'd sub-transaction
Следующее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] About upgrading a (tuple?) lock in a rollback'd sub-transaction