Re: Cluster name in ps output

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Frost
Тема Re: Cluster name in ps output
Дата
Msg-id 20140505140135.GG2556@tamriel.snowman.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Cluster name in ps output  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Cluster name in ps output  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> How about dropping the brackets, and the cluster-name concept, and
> just doing
>
>      postgres: 5432 checkpointer process

-1 for my part, as I'd just end up with a bunch of those and no
distinction between the various processes.  In other words, without a
cluster distinction, it's useless.

Including the value of listen_addresses along w/ the port would make it
useful.  If we really don't want the cluster-name concept (which,
personally, I like quite a bit), how about including the listen_address
value if it isn't '*'?  I could see that also helping users who
installed from a distro and got '127.0.0.1' and don't understand why
they can't connect...

Of course, these are users who can use 'ps' but not 'netstat'.  Not sure
how big that set really is.
Thanks,
    Stephen

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Cluster name in ps output
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Minor improvement to fdwhandler.sgml