On 2015-08-27 14:32:39 +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> >v10b misses the checkpoint_sort part of the patch, and thus cannot be
> >applied.
>
> Yes, indeed, the second part is expected to be applied on top of v10a.
Oh, sorry. I'd somehow assumed they were two variants of the same patch
(one with "slim" sorting and the other without).