Re: Dangling Client Backend Process

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: Dangling Client Backend Process
Дата
Msg-id 20151014101227.GK10323@awork2.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Dangling Client Backend Process  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: Dangling Client Backend Process  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2015-10-14 17:33:01 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> If I recall correctly, he concerned about killing the backends
> running transactions which could be saved. I have a sympathy with
> the opinion.

I still don't. Leaving backends alive after postmaster has died prevents
the auto-restart mechanism to from working from there on.  Which means
that we'll potentially continue happily after another backend has
PANICed and potentially corrupted shared memory. Which isn't all that
unlikely if postmaster isn't around anymore.

Andres



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Use pg_rewind when target timeline was switched
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: remaining open items