Re: pg_upgrade 9.4 -> 9.5 with pg_trgm fails for me

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Karsten Hilbert
Тема Re: pg_upgrade 9.4 -> 9.5 with pg_trgm fails for me
Дата
Msg-id 20160108115833.GC22446@hermes.hilbert.loc
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на pg_upgrade 9.4 -> 9.5 with pg_trgm fails for me  (Karsten Hilbert <Karsten.Hilbert@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-general
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 12:45:29PM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:

>     pg_restore: erstelle EXTENSION „pg_trgm“
>     pg_restore: erstelle COMMENT „EXTENSION "pg_trgm"“
>     pg_restore: erstelle FUNCTION „pg_catalog.gtrgm_in("cstring")“
>     pg_restore: [Archivierer (DB)] Fehler in Phase PROCESSING TOC:
>     pg_restore: [Archivierer (DB)] Fehler in Inhaltsverzeichniseintrag 893; 1255 511230 FUNCTION gtrgm_in("cstring")
postgres
>     pg_restore: [Archivierer (DB)] could not execute query: ERROR:  pg_type OID value not set when in binary upgrade
mode
>         Die Anweisung war: CREATE FUNCTION "gtrgm_in"("cstring") RETURNS "gtrgm"
>         LANGUAGE "c" IMMUTABLE STRICT
>         AS '$libdir/pg_trgm', 'gtrgm_in'...
>
> For one thing - does it seem odd that the function would be
> named "gtrgm_in" rather than "pgtrgm_in" ?

A bit of searching shows that that seems to be normal.

Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Karsten Hilbert
Дата:
Сообщение: pg_upgrade 9.4 -> 9.5 with pg_trgm fails for me
Следующее
От: Karsten Hilbert
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade 9.4 -> 9.5 with pg_trgm fails for me