On 2016-03-27 12:38:25 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Alexander Korotkov <
> a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>
> > Thank you very much for testing!
> > I also got access to 4 x 18 Intel server with 144 threads. I'm going to
> > post results of tests on this server in next Monday.
> >
>
> I've run pgbench tests on this machine: pgbench -s 1000 -c $clients -j 100
> -M prepared -T 300.
> See results in the table and chart.
>
> clients master v3 v5
> 1 11671 12507 12679
> 2 24650 26005 25010
> 4 49631 48863 49811
> 8 96790 96441 99946
> 10 121275 119928 124100
> 20 243066 243365 246432
> 30 359616 342241 357310
> 40 431375 415310 441619
> 50 489991 489896 500590
> 60 538057 636473 554069
> 70 588659 714426 738535
> 80 405008 923039 902632
> 90 295443 1181247 1155918
> 100 258695 1323125 1325019
> 110 238842 1393767 1410274
> 120 226018 1432504 1474982
> 130 215102 1465459 1503241
> 140 206415 1470454 1505380
> 150 197850 1475479 1519908
> 160 190935 1420915 1484868
> 170 185835 1438965 1453128
> 180 182519 1416252 1453098
>
> My conclusions are following:
> 1) We don't observe any regression in v5 in comparison to master.
> 2) v5 in most of cases slightly outperforms v3.
What commit did you base these tests on? I guess something recent, after
98a64d0bd?
> I'm going to do some code cleanup of v5 in Monday
Ok, I'll try to do a review and possibly commit after that.
Greetings,
Andres Freund