Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-03-31 10:15:21 +0900, Ian Barwick wrote:
> > Patch changes the error message to:
> >
> > ERROR: replication slots can only be used if wal_level is "replica" or "logical"
> >
> > Explicitly naming the valid WAL levels matches the wording in the wal_level
> > error hint used in a couple of places, i.e.
>
> The explicit naming makes it much more verbose to change anything around
> wal level though, so consider me not a fan of spelling out all levels.
I thought we had agreed that we weren't going to consider the wal_level
values as a linear scale -- in other words, wordings such as "greater
than FOO" are discouraged. That's always seemed a bit odd to me.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services